So, if you’re a few years out from Dday and are on the reconciliation path, is your relationship better than before? If so, in what ways? And how did it get better?
I think you can all understand that I would see 'a few years out from d-day' as a critical element in these questions. I'm pretty far from d-day, after all.
Look, your thoughts and feelings about being betrayed will change over time. Based on my reading here and elsewhere, it looks like people a year or 2 out have a lot in common, and we diverge from that. The rule of thumb here for recovery is 2-5 years. R(econciliation) requires more work than recovering from being betrayed, so my reco is to think even longer term.
R is an individual effort. It's not a contest. What one couple does and how they think and feel about each other doesn't have much relationship with what other couples think about their Ms. A few of us think R is going great - but 1, 2, 5 years after d-day, it turns out that R was false - either because of yet another fuck-up by the WS or because the BS realizes they don't want to spend the rest of their lives (or another minute) with their WS, even if their WS is truly doing everything right.
It makes no sense to me to enter R expecting anything less than an M that is better than before the A(s).After all, the pre-A M was vulnerable to an A, and I can't see wanting to go back to that. If you don't think a better M is possible or desirable, my reco would be to D. Likewise, if you see R as a competition with other Ms, I don't see how R can work well.
IMO, R has to come from within. It has to be an expression of what each of you wants as individuals. It has to be a joint effort. It requires honesty within and between each individual. It has to result in an M all individuals in the M want, and it has to allow for wanting to be together as wants and reality change.
IMO, if you R, you build the M you are willing to work for and the M that fits your preconceptions. If you think R is a shit sandwich, it will be a shit sandwich (and I don't understand why anyone would choose that). If you enter R thinking the WS's A(s) were exciting or fulfilling or immensely pleasurable or immensely positive in some other way you value, you'll probably have a lot of resentment, and that's a barrier to R and to your own healing. (I didn't commit to R until I came to believe what my W said about her A. It was not any sort of relationship I wanted.)
So back to your questions.
Yeah, I think our M is better than it would have been without the A. I wish my W had chosen a less painful way to hit her rock bottom, but she didn't.
I don't have the words to describe the ways in which our M is better, but I think it's better in every way. I simply can't think of a way in which it's worse except that my W's A smashed many illusions - but I think smashing illusion is a Good Thing. Sometimes I miss the innocence illusion; most of the time I don't.
Our M got better because we became more honest with each ourselves and with each other. We raise issues and resolve them. Working together builds healthy bonds. Resolving issues reduces stress and frees more energy for pleasure. And we keep getting more honest with ourselves as we learn lessons from our lives.
*****
The wisest thing I heard after d-day was that R requires 3 healings: BS heals BS; WS heals WS; together they (re)build the M.
I had to heal myself. I got help, but I had to do the work. My W provided support, but she could do nothing to heal me. But I was the only one who truly knew my pain, and I was the only one who could do the work that would heal me.
My W had to heal herself. She got lots of help and my support. But she was the only one who truly knew her pain, and she was the only one who could do the work that would heal her.
And we rebuilt our M together, although it looks a lot like our original M was supposed to be - 2 individuals who chose to be together. We always loved each other, and we always made room for each other's individuality.
[This message edited by SI Staff at 5:38 PM, Tuesday, June 6th]