The whole better/marriage 2.0 is not true.
Those of us who were betrayed without the mad hat, it’s very different.
Of course the first statement is an absolute. An absolute statement is one that is true without exception or uncertainty. If we take your words at face, then you are saying that 0 marriages are better following d-day…….and I guess the necessary inference is therefore that everyone who says theirs is better is lying? That may be your opinion, and you are entitled to it, but you can’t possibly know that. When you received pushback, instead of softening your stance you moved the goalposts by by modifying who your original statement applied to (marriages involving infidelity where only one partner cheated versus madhatter marriages). FYI, this is a perfect example of the "No true Scotsman" fallacy.
In modifying your original argument, you then purport to speak on behalf of all betrayed spouses (who are not madhatters). Not only are generalizations and/or purporting to speak on behalf others contrary to the guidelines of this site (and clearly rubbing some members the wrong way), but as someone who is still pretty early into your ONLY first-hand experience with infidelity, it seems incredibly audacious to suggest you are capable and qualified to speak on behalf of such a large group of people. The reality, as pointed out by others, is that you can’t possibly know what is true for other people’s marriages. HINHF, you are absolutely the expert on your own situation and I do not doubt for one minute that what you are saying is true for you, but like most of us here, your expertise on the subject of infidelity and reconciliation is limited to your own experience, and however common you perceive your experience to be (based on your anecdotal research) it clearly is not universal. To suggest that it is, is an example of the hasty generalization fallacy (sorry, I'm a nerd about this stuff). Just because X is true for you, and X is also true for B, C, and D, does not mean that X is true for E, F, G, and H. Put another way, you don’t get to speak for me.
For the record, I don’t think you’d have received any pushback at all if you tempered your statement or acknowledged it was your opinion (rather than stating it as a fact).
----
Now to the original question.
Why reconcile? What’s the point? What’s the end game? What’s the purpose and benefit ? Is there really such a thing as happily reconciled marriage after so much damage has been done?
For those of you who decided to reconcile, why did you do it? And are you happy with the decision?
I think people’s reasons for R tend to be pretty personal. For me, I tried to think about the life and marriage I wanted for myself (based on the current knowledge base that included the A - not what I had wanted or planned for myself the day before d-day) and tried to determine whether I felt that staying with my H was the best way to achieve that or not. Obviously that involved a fair bit of consideration as to whether my husband was a good candidate for R, whether I believed he had it in him to do the enormous work of being vulnerable and digging into himself and his whys and all the other stuff that WSs need to do. I also had to be honest about whether I was a good candidate for R, if indeed he was able to do all those things. (Both are necessary!) Would I be able to respect him again, would I be able to feel pride in the relationship, would I be able to keep my respect for myself in tact, and be able to do the work I would need to do to get over my ego, and the trauma, and the sexual hang-ups, and all the resentments and fears that the A had drudged up. As devastated as a I was, I am strong , self-reliant and adaptable. I know my worth. I had other options - good ones even - and as much as I loved him, I was not willing to settle for a unhappy marriage just to avoid the consequences of divorce. My standards and expectations were high.
I’m 7 years out and I’ve considered myself reconciled for a while now. I am happy with my life and decision to stay. I know that my happiness with the way things are now doesn't guarantee my future.
As often as it comes up, I have always disliked the premise of the question of whether my new marriage is better than my old one. It feels impossible to compare. It’s been 7 years – my husband and I are both different people than we were 7 years ago, and infidelity or not, we would always have been different people 7 years later than we were back then. There was never a crystal ball, I have no idea what things would have looked like had not happened. I am aware of how people can become complacent as they settle in to ‘the rest of their lives’. I worry that could easily have been us eventually. The dysfunction and the things that led to his A in the first place, were always there. Maybe his A was always inevitable – if not then, then sometime. If it had happened later, maybe the dysfunction and resentments would have been that much more entrenched, and change would have been that much harder that R, such that the marriage I have today, this marriage i love, would not have been possible. I just don’t know – I can’t. That's the problem with this question.
What I do know is that our marriage and relationship is both more fragile and more resilient than I had ever appreciated beforehand. Having been through all this, I know I am far less likely to take any of that for granted going forward. I am not a black/white thinker - I assume that helped quite a bit in getting to where I am now. I am able to look at my husband today and see him for the wonderful, flawed person that he is. I know I have never been perfect either.
Despite all of my gratitude for where I am now, you’ll never catch me saying something like, "his infidelity is the best thing that ever happened to us." I will NEVER be grateful that it happened. It was easily the hardest thing I’ve ever gone through. What I am grateful for (and fucking proud of too), is how we handled it. I don’t say that to be cocky, and I apologize if it comes across that way. With the benefit of hindsight (it certainly didn’t feel great at the time), I can see that infidelity was the catalyst for a lot of growth, learning, vulnerability, discovery, improvements in communication, advances in understanding, etc etc. that I am not sure would have happened if there wasn’t a giant fire lit under both of our asses.
I don’t believe in happily ever after - never have. Good marriages aren’t bestowed upon the lucky, they involve a lot of effort. I refuse to look at my marriage (or my husband) like some special beautiful ornament on a shelf that was broken and glued back together, but will forever be damaged or less valuable than it was before. If I believed that, I truly wouldn’t still be here - I'd be out looking for a better ornament. If you believe the best will always be behind you, I can’t imagine being motivated to put the effort in necessary to achieve better. It seems like a self-fulfilling prophecy.
Lots of people cite logistical reasons (worry about finances, child custody, division of assets etc) and while I agree those things are valid, practical, necessary considerations (that existed for me too!), I think true R has to be about more than wanting to avoid divorce. You have to want more than just staying together and you have to want more than for things to go back to the way they were. That’s enough to stay married I suppose, but for true R, I really do believe that both of you have to be all in.
Edit: I am aware that my above response has the potential to come across as sanctimonious to some, particularly to those who didn’t have the same options that I had when choosing whether to stay or go, due to very real privileges I absolutely acknowledge in terms of my relative age, financial circumstances, ability to support myself, and the fact that we did not have any children at the time (though that was a factor that wasn’t as straightforward as you might think) etc. I didn’t write any of the above to be insensitive and I hope it’s not taken that way. It’s know it’s a lot easier to stand on my soapbox and preach about having high expectations and the work of a BS when I had a remorseful spouse, who appeared to be willing, ready, and able to do the work. I am very aware that not everyone who wants that, gets that. That said, I don’t know if my spouse would have gotten there on his own, if he thought keeping me and complacency was an option. I also don’t think that would have been enough.
[This message edited by emergent8 at 2:18 AM, Friday, March 15th]