@sissoon
Thank you for the clarification. I am so sorry it took so long to reply. Real world issues took over. (Ha. Don’t we all have them.)
The book I wanted to refer to in the healing library is "Surviving Betrayal".
First, I want to qualify it as being a book for women, not men, and not a recent publication.
That being said, the page I am going to reference could easily apply to men as well.
And perhaps the fact that I still find advice from the daily contemplations useful, 2.5 decades after its publication and a decade after my own crisis, is a testimony that it has an element of timelessness.
Second, is my reference: (Page 88) Here it talks about not being shamed by others for loving the person (in this case, a man) who betrayed us. In summary, that they often struggle with mental illnesses and addictions, so we are likely loving an ill spouse. And that we are sometimes surrounded by a world that shames and blames us for trying to be on a very difficult journey of healing with them, or at least hoping they will heal too. We are not bad because we love a person who is in crisis.
In consideration of how this relates to the original poster’s point, this sight and my own prior post, I see it as such:
It is important for all of us to recognize that even in the shared goal of healthy reconciliation, we are not always making the same 180 choices because our landscapes are different. Our ripple effects of choices differ.
What works to "180" for one person may not work for another person. Someone else’s choices could put them, their family or even wayward spouse in an even more precarious place than they are starting from. Or they may need other steps or progressions toward what they need to do first.
I could give my own examples, but really, I think the OP has valid points, if we all think back and how someone else’s choices and options may differ and that can delay healthy connection if mis-guided.
What I do value about the book and about a "180" approach is that both progress and move oneself to the concept of learning and planning healthy self care (which a "180" plan is a pivotal part of) so that you can learn to survive emotionally no matter if reconciled, separated, or single post betrayal.
Oh! The book also covers progressing toward healthy detachment vs indifference (page 79). That also applies to the OPs post. And is likely a huge struggle for many of us who had to "180" in various ways.
To not be shamed in how we handle our healthy boundaries and self care differently, and to know we can work toward emotional detachment rather than emotional indifference is a possible pathway of healthy connection in reconciliation. Not a fast-track. But perhaps a pathway that can be missed and cause delay.
(By the way…that book is beat to heck, high lighted, ear marked and stickered. Some pages were not a match. Some saved my sanity.)
Sissoon, if I over referenced or this was confusing, let me know. I am very grateful for this site and want to be sure to always respect the rules and guidance, and repair comments if I do.
[This message edited by Uxoragain at 7:06 PM, Tuesday, August 8th]