One's best bet is to ALWAYS read critically.
Those at a similar place on the timeline are good checks on what you feel. Those ahead of you on the timeline are decent predictors of how you're likely to feel if your circumstances are analogous enough.
Whether you're at approximately the same place as another poster or behind another poster, all posts provide insight into the variations of thoughts and feelings that can hit you at any particular time.
Read posts. Then figure out how you can use them.
*****
My W was deep in a fog during her A. By that I mean she was out of touch with reality. She just wasn't perceiving what was actually happening, and her thinking was way, way off. She just kept making choices that didn't work out the way she expected them to.
On d-day, just before I asked the critical question, she says she decided that being honest was the least that she could do. (It turns out she meant she expected to do more, but she had decided to be honest no matter what happened.) So I never got TT, blame-shifting, or minimizing.
IMO, R can't begin without a commitment to honesty. That means, also IMO, no more lies from the WS. That means answering every question as honestly as possible - no one knows 100% of their motivations, so questions about motivations might elicit different, more insightful and complete answers as a WS heals.
Who/what/when/where/how questions may elicit more info about any event, but late information will be congruent with early answers. If they're not, you've got TT.
Have you considered demanding a written timeline from your WS? I mean 'demand' - you walk if your WS won't supply it.
Have you considered offering to work together on the TL? That way, you can work with an event, ask all the questions you care about ATM, and document the answers. Later, if you think you're getting TT, you can check the TL and find out if it really is TT.
Bottom line: the fog is, IMO, real, but it's not in any way an excuse. It an obstacle to be resolved, but the WS is the only one who can resolve the WS's fog.
And the BS is the only one who can resolve the BS's fog, which usually shows up in statements that somehow excuse the BS.
And you really have to consider drawing a solid line. You need to decide how long you'll allow the lies by commission, by omission, and by changing the subject to go on before you act - but you (wjb) seem to have taken some good steps in that area.
*****
We all have to realize that we can hold contradictory thoughts in our heads, and they all may be true. For example:
I was not a perfect H, but my W's A was not about me.
My W was manipulated into the A, but she could and should have refused the hooks that caught her.
I have to risk the M to save it.
*****
Make your goal healing - processing the thoughts and feelings that come with being betrayed out of your body. Maybe you'll R; maybe you'll D. But you can't R successfully without healing, and you can't have a successful D without healing.
BS heals BS.
WS heals WS.
Together BS & WS heal/build/rebuild the M, if they choose to.
[This message edited by SI Staff at 7:42 PM, Monday, May 20th]